Piper Alderman
Contact Us
16/09/2022
In a reverse mortgage transaction, extra care needs to be taken when a Power of Attorney is involved to ensure the transaction is not deemed unconscionable.
This article will provide a brief summary of how and when a Power of Attorney can be used by an individual when entering into a reverse mortgage.
What is a Reverse Mortgage?
With a reverse mortgage, a borrower can take out a loan using their home as equity. Typically, reverse mortgages are taken out by pensioners or retirees as there is no requirement to make repayments until the borrower has either vacated the property or died.
What is a Power of Attorney?
A Power Of Attorney (POA) is a formal instrument which grants an attorney authority or power to represent the principal.[1] In New South Wales powers of attorney generally fall into the following categories:
What powers can my attorney have?
The powers granted to the attorney can include:
What are the duties and responsibilities of an attorney?
An attorney is legally responsible to you and must (among other things):
In the event that an attorney abuses their position of trust, legal action can be taken to protect the Principal’s interests.
Power of Attorney requirements when entering into a reverse mortgage
Requirements before entering into and signing finance documents
Before your attorney enters into and signs the finance documents facilitating a reverse mortgage:
Benefits to attorneys or third parties
There is a general prohibition on attorneys conferring a benefit on themselves or third parties using the Principal’s finances. An attorney or a third party may only receive a benefit if the POA document expressly authorises the conferral of the benefit.[7] In the case that an attorney has conferred a benefit to themselves without express authorisation, the Court may find that the attorney will not be able to recover the benefit.[8] Moreover, it is a criminal offence for an attorney to exercise their power of attorney to confer a benefit to themselves or third parties without express authorisation by the principal.[9]
Can my attorney enter into a reverse mortgage on my behalf if I no longer have capacity?
If you are no longer of sound mind or you are mentally incapacitated, then you will be unable to apply for the loan, consent to the loan or instruct your attorney to sign the loan on your behalf. You will be unable to seek independent legal and financial advice. In addition , there is legislation in place that prohibits your attorney from using their powers for their own benefit.
If the attorney requires financing by mortgaging the Principal’s assets, then the attorney must seek an order from the public trustee to consent to such arrangements, provided that the public trustee forms the view that such a loan would be in the best interest of the Principal, for example, the reverse mortgage could be for the benefit of the Principal if the proceeds from the loan were used solely for the purpose of paying for medical care and paying for general care of the Principal.
Do I need to seek independent legal advice if my attorney enters into a reverse mortgage on my behalf?
Yes. Even if your attorney enters into a reverse mortgage on your behalf and has received independent legal advice, the Principal must also receive independent legal advice.
As a case example, an 86 year old lady (Angelina), granted an enduring power of attorney to her son, Michael. Angelina and Michael entered into a $400,000 loan as co-borrowers and signed a mortgage over Angelina’s property. Michael received independent legal advice in his own right, however, Angelina did not obtain independent legal advice. The Court found that if a lender is to rely on independent legal advice being given to Michael, “the latter herself (Angelina) must receive the independent legal advice”. [10]
It must be noted that obtaining independent legal advice will not always preclude a finding of unconscionability and a lender must make further personal and financial enquiries if there are suspicions of a borrower’s or Principal’s vulnerability.[11]
Key Takeaways
16 September 2022
[1] Despot v Registrar-General [2013] NSWCA 13 [48].
[2] Powers of Attorney Act 2003 (NSW) s 52.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Vickery v JJP Custodians [2002] NSWSC 782
[5] Siahos v JP Morgan Trust Australia Ltd [2009] NSWCA 20.
[6] Powers of Attorney Act 2003 (NSW) s 19(1).
[7] Ibid ss 12 and 13.
[8] Siahos v JP Morgan Trust Australia Ltd [2009] NSWCA 20.
[9] Crimes Act (NSW) 1990 ss 192E and 117.
[10] Spina v Permanent Custodians [2009] NSWCA 206.
[11] Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 6.