ASIC Guidance on cryptocurrency token sales: a ban or sensible regulation?
The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) yesterday issued a press release and guidance for those considering launching an Initial Coin Offering (ICO/Token Sales).
The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) yesterday issued a press release and guidance for those considering launching an Initial Coin Offering (ICO/Token Sales). Given the ease with which an ICO (also known as a Token Sale) can be launched, and the huge amounts raised to date (USD$2.115 billion this year alone) this guidance has been eagerly awaited from ASIC.
Partner, Michael Bacina discusses.
Clickbait title aside, while Australia has not banned Token Sales, anyone looking to issue crypto tokens in or to Australian’s will need to be careful they don’t fall foul of the Australian regulatory landscape, which is markedly different to the US system.
The information sheet, descriptively named INFO225 reiterates a similar position taken by the US Securities and Exchange Commission, namely that the legal status of a Token Sale will depend on the circumstances and features of the cryptocurrency coins being offered for sale.
ASIC Commissioner John Price also spoke the obvious in saying
“ICOs are highly speculative investments, are mostly unregulated, and the chance of losing your investment is high. Consumers should understand the risks involved, including hte potential for these products to be scams, before investing.”
While Token Sales are considered a form of crowdfunding, ASIC has made clear that it does not consider that Token Sales will fall under the new Australian crowdfunding regulatory framework which commenced 29 September 2017. That crowdfunding framework permits licensed operators to raise capital in exchange for equity in public and private companies (subject of course to various requirements).
So when will a Token Sale in Australia fall under ASIC’s regulatory reach?
1. When the token sale is a Managed Investment Scheme
The best example of an ICO which would be considered to be an MIS is The DAO. The DAO (a Decentralised Autonomous Organisation) was set up specifically to raise money which was to be invested in start-up projects, with the intention that profits would be returned to those participating in the fundraising. It seems that utility tokens (which might be described as a pre-purchase of a future product) are unlikely to be considered an MIS at this time given they usually lack the features which are present in an MIS (for more on different types of tokens see here).
2. When the token is really a share in a company
Australia doesn’t use the Howey test applied in the USA to determine if a crypto coin is a security. But ASIC will still have regard to the bundle of rights attaching to the coins, and has stated it will look to the whitepaper issued with a Token Sale to help decide if an offer of cryptocurrency coins is in fact a share offer.
“if there appears to be ownership of the body, voting rights in decisions of the body or some right to participate in profits of the body shown in the white paper — then it is likely that the coins could fall within the definition of a share.”
While there is great opportunities for tokens to be used to facilitate a record of ownership of shares (such as by replacing share certificates) we are some time away from acceptance of tokens becoming a kind of bearer share for companies shares.
The obvious example of a crypto token which is likely to be considered a share are the tokens issued under Aragon’s platform which are used to represent ownership in Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (but given the limbo status of those organisations, the allocation of tokens for any given DAO via Aragon is more analogous to an agreed proportion of a stake in a joint venture).
3. When the token is a derivative
If a business is dealing in derivatives, it will need an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) or risk prosecution.
Any coin which is designed to change in price based on factors such as an underlying financial product or market or asset price and which will require payment as part of the rights or obligations attaching to the coin may be considered to be a derivative by ASIC.
The definitions and interpretations of derivatives in Australian law are complex and have led to lengthy lawsuits. This area is one that those looking to issue tokens in a Token Sale will need to be very careful of given the very broad operation of s761D of the Corporations Act.
4. When a business is operating a financial market
Further to this, recent changes to money laundering and anti-terrorism funding laws in Australia have placed additional paperwork burdens on cryptocurrency exchanges.
So what’s next?