Employment Relations Podcast #17 – Civil underpayments vs Criminal wage theft: Compare the pair


Authors: Emily Haar, Tim Lange

Service: Employment & Labour | Employment Relations Podcast

In Episode 17 of our Employment Law for the Time Poor Podcast, Partner Tim Lange, and Senior Associate Emily Haar, work through current employer exposure to civil and criminal liability for underpayments, including through the civil remedy provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), as well as new and proposed criminal provisions relating to “wage theft”.

Whatever the cause, underpayments happen in Australia’s highly regulated labour relations system. When they do, will the employer be able to just fix the underpayment in a practical sense or will there be some broader reputational and legal consequence with the use and misuse of the allegation that a business is engaging in “wage theft”, a term that has been trending for some time now?

Emily and Tim discuss the origins of the Fair Work Act underpayment provisions, and the new state (Victorian and Queensland) wage theft legislation, as well as the proposed criminal offences contained in the IR Omnibus Bill currently before the Federal Parliament. Click here for further updates on the IR Omnibus Bill.

The key difference between an underpayment and a “wage theft” scenario will be the dishonest nature of the conduct. To best manage potential liabilities, employers will need to start dealing and managing pay claims in a manner similar to maintain due diligence in a safety context.

Subscribe via your preferred podcasting application:

  • Apple Podcasts
  • Spotify
  • Google Podcasts
  • If you use a different podcast app you can subscribe to the podcast by copying and pasting in to the RSS feed

Piper Alderman is assisting clients on the spectrum of legal issue arising from the pandemic.  Please see our COVID-19 resource hub for more information on areas including employment, industrial relations, construction law, government & defence, insolvency and property.